I want to record guitar, some percussion(tambourine, a snare drum), bass, vocals and keyboard, but I can only afford one mic. I can likely get a used SM58 or SM57 for $70 - $80 Canadian. Which would be best for multi-purpose recording?
War Eagle and God bless.
Would that change my fuzz-tone at all? Most mics I have used altered my dirty tones and made them sound real cheap and digital. I've never used a Shure before, though.
the SM57 is the most popular mic ever for electric guitar. The only time I experienced what you're referring to is when I tried to use an SM58 to mic an amp.
Just toss a coin
Gentle Robot - Chapel Hill NC Rock Band
Seagull Artist Mosaic (acoustic)Fender Strat PlusLine 6 M9Traynor YCV40WR
Neither. I'd buy a condenser like an Apex 415. Much more versatile than a 57 or a 58. And when you're ready you can upgrade it with better caps and resistors.
- IAN C. -Rig: PRS | Schecter USA | Gibson | Axe-Fx II | empress effectsBeta tester: Fractal Audio | empress effects
What's the difference between a condenser and a dynamic(that's what an SM57 is right?)?
Originally posted by DAVIDCOUPE What's the difference between a condenser and a dynamic(that's what an SM57 is right?)?
Dynamic microphones work by electromagnetic induction. Like you strings over your pickups. There's a coil that moves over a magnet that produces the signal.
In a condenser microphone there's a capacitor and sound waves change the distance between the plates. Which changes the capacitance. Which is converted to an electrical signal. Just about all of them need phantom power to work.
Then there's the pattern of the microphone. The SM-57 pattern is cardioid. It does a good job of picking up what's exactly in front of it and ignoring what's beside it and really ignoring what's behind. That's what makes it a great microphone for live situations, or mic'ing drums: the pickup pattern of the mic helps solve bleed problems.
The Apex I pointed you to can do cardioid, omni- or bi-directional (figure 8) so you can choose to add more or less of the room ambiance to what you're capturing. A very useful thing to be able to do in a controlled recording environment. For example: an acoustic guitar recorded on a hardwood floor using a bi-directional pattern sounds large and open. Same situation with a cardioid pattern and it's less boomy, more string noise and focused. With the Apex you have a choice.
I agree with iaresee if you are going to use the mic for recording only.
If there is a choice between an SM57 and an SM58:
SM58 - More robust, costs slightly more.SM57 - Slightly more compact, cheaper.
Oh oh you've hit the hot button!
THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY IDENTICAL.
Sorry to shout but if you really want to educate yourself check out the specs from Shure's web site.
Turns out whether the mic has a switch or not makes a bigger difference than whether it is an SM57 or an SM58!
I see people continue to perpetuate the 'but I hear a difference myth'. I played with a guitarist who believed it with a passion. In the studio I switched all his precious SM57's for SM58's and he didn't notice a difference. I swapped in AKG D80's and he thought his amp had hit a sweet spot (it was new and being run in).
I have played with singers who passionately believe that an SM57 is better for their vocals than an SM58. I am more inclined to accept that with proximity the SM57 and the SM58 do sound slightly different when micing vocals, but even then the difference is tiny.
My Gear , please wack with the side of your hand for normal service.Bringing you EVIL VOODOO WAX MAGIC since 2009
It is not a difficult task to use another mic. If you are facing this problem again an again then visit this blog. Your problem will be solved. We are guitar specialist. Electric guitar.
Originally Posted by AliBilIt is not a difficult task to use another mic. If you are facing this problem again an again then visit this blog. Your problem will be solved. We are guitar specialist. Electric guitar.
the post is 8 years old.
we say Grace, we say Amen, life is short!